Compartir
Independent Directors in Asia: A Historical, Contextual and Comparative Approach (International Corporate law and Financial Market Regulation) (en Inglés)
Luke Nottage
(Ilustrado por)
·
Dan W. Puchniak
(Ilustrado por)
·
Harald Baum
(Ilustrado por)
·
Cambridge University Press
· Tapa Blanda
Independent Directors in Asia: A Historical, Contextual and Comparative Approach (International Corporate law and Financial Market Regulation) (en Inglés) - Puchniak, Dan W. ; Baum, Harald ; Nottage, Luke
$ 85.832
$ 107.290
Ahorras: $ 21.458
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Reino Unido
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Viernes 02 de Agosto y el
Lunes 12 de Agosto.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Argentina entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Independent Directors in Asia: A Historical, Contextual and Comparative Approach (International Corporate law and Financial Market Regulation) (en Inglés)"
The rise of the independent director in Asia is an issue of global consequence that has been largely overlooked until recently. Less than two decades ago, independent directors were oddities in Asia's boardrooms. Today, they are ubiquitous. Independent Directors in Asia undertakes the first detailed analysis of this phenomenon. It provides in-depth historical, contextual and comparative perspectives on the law and practice of independent directors in seven core Asian jurisdictions (China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan) and Australia. These case studies reveal the varieties of independent directors in Asia, none of which conform to its original American concept. The authors develop a taxonomy of these varieties, which provides a powerful analytical tool for more accurately understanding and effectively researching independent directors in Asia. This new approach challenges foundational aspects of comparative corporate governance practice and suggests a new path for comparative corporate governance scholarship and reform.
